Every product team in 2026 is being told AI will make them more efficient and more effective.
Budgets are moving. Headcount plans are shifting. Tools are being bought. Boards are promised productivity lift. CEOs are giving keynotes about AI transformation.
Almost nobody is measuring whether the promise is delivered.
This is the AI productivity accountability gap. It is not a technology problem. It is a measurement problem. The same teams that meticulously track engineering velocity with DORA metrics have no equivalent measurement for whether their product operations are actually better because of AI.
How do you know you are more efficient unless you measure the system? How do you know you are more effective unless you measure the outcomes? How do you know the AI investment is working unless you measure both?
The gap is dangerous because it is invisible. A team that looks busy can feel productive. A team that adopts AI tools can feel modern. But feeling productive and being productive are different things. Feeling modern and being effective are different things.
Engineering solved this problem for their own function years ago. DORA metrics. CI/CD dashboards. Code review analytics. But engineering is one of six functions on a product team.
What about strategy? What about design? What about GTM, operations, intelligence? The other five functions are flying blind.
DAC is the measurement layer for the AI productivity era. Three frameworks. 51 dimensions. Six functions. One score that tells you whether the promise is being delivered, sprint over sprint.
The accountability gap closes when you can see the system. Not when you buy more tools. Not when you run more meetings about AI. When you measure what matters.
Free. No sign-up required.